fbpx

Should cameras be allowed inside Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser? – DePaoli on DeParks

by Jeff DePaoli

Should cameras be allowed inside Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser? It’s a difficult question to answer because it’s hard to compare it to any other kind of experience. It’s a first of its kind. We can try and compare it to a piece of theatre which typically doesn’t allow cameras, but it could also be compared to a theme park attraction where cameras are the norm these days. Let’s take a closer look.

In the world of traditional theatre where there is a live performance occurring on a stage in front of you, cameras are typically not allowed. If you go to a Broadway show or even a regional production, one of the last things you hear before the performance begins is an announcement stating that recording of any kind is prohibited. If you decide not to follow this rule you can be kicked out of the performance. But perhaps comparing Galactic Starcruiser to traditional theatre isn’t the best comparison.

A better comparison would be an immersive experience like “Sleep No More” or “The Nest” where you are a character living in the world of a story unfolding all around you. In both of those experiences, the rules about having your phones out are even more strict than in traditional theatre. But why aren’t cameras allowed in these scenarios and do the same situations apply to Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser?

Part of the reason is because the content being shown is copyrighted material. Therefore, the person taking the video or photo doesn’t have the permission of the content producers or creators if they’ve established a no-camera rule. It’s very much the same reason you can’t record a movie in a movie theater. In this case, Disney hasn’t set that rule. So, apparently the owners of the material are giving permission for the full experience to be recorded in the case of Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser.

star wars galactic starcruiser

But why else isn’t recording allowed at theatrical or immersive productions? The big reason in my mind is because by experiencing something through a camera lens, you’re taking yourself out of the moment and therefore not having the intended experience. Even if you’re not the individual shooting video, seeing a mass of screens held above fellow spectator’s heads diminishes the experience for everyone nearby. The whole point of an immersive experience is to be fully immersed in the moment. We live in a world where, if proof of your experience isn’t posted on social media it didn’t really happen. Of course, that is factually untrue. It did happen. But the opposite, what feels like majority mindset, also seems to be a reality.

The fact is you can’t be fully engaged in two things at once, and you can’t be fully immersed in something if you’re not fully engaged. By taking a video or a photo in a moment, you’re taking yourself out of that moment. I know this simply sounds like “old man talk,” but the reality is that it’s true. I’m certainly not saying that I never take videos or photos of experiences or that I don’t post them on social media, but there is a time and place for everything. And its ok for some situations, no matter how grand the experience, to not allow cameras. For myself, I like to follow the rule that I don’t record or document content I’m experiencing for the first time. The exception I allow is if I’m doing it for work purposes.

From a business level, Disney and other entertainment companies partially count on social media posts from guests to help advertise their products. In the case of Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser, it was probably a good thing that guests were able to share their experiences through video as it tended to get a better response than the professional video marketing released by Disney. But I don’t want to spend a large sum simply to market for the company I’m paying while lessening my experience.

star wars galactic starcruiser

Of course, unlike a two or three-hour experience, Disney couldn’t make guests shut off their phones for multiple days. What I would do if I were the decision maker is I would only allow photos in certain locations and not allow video at all. I would also work in a system where video is being taken of guests experiencing things, like lightsaber training, and then have the footage automatically sent to the guest’s email or app. There are several benefits to a system like this. The guest would be able to live in the moment during the experience instead of shooting footage, and Disney would get to control the quality of the content being released. Think of it as an extension to Disney PhotoPass. Guests of the Halcyon are certainly paying enough and any extra perks with perceived value would make the guests even happier.

The reality is that some experiences are simply meant to be experienced in person. When a live performance or experience is conceived and directed, it is done so with the live guest in mind. There are plenty of examples of live shows being professionally shot. On Disney+ you can watch “live” productions of “Hamliton” and “Newsies.” I’m happy they exist, but there really is nothing like experiencing it in person. I love the idea of as many people having access to content as possible, but I also recognize and appreciate when something is simply meant for one format. I would consider Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser to be something that is meant for an in-person format only.

Sometimes you’re not supposed to be able to rewind things and experience them over and over. Live entertainment has an innate fragility where it will never be seen or performed in the exact same way again. That is the excitement of live entertainment, and recording it diminishes that excitement. Knowing it will never happen in the same way again, and that it will be the only time you get to experience it, forces you to live as fully in that present moment as possible.

That sort of one-time-only experience I write about is the most exciting kind of entertainment, in my mind. I haven’t personally experienced Galactic Starcruiser myself, and I don’t see myself having the chance to experience it anytime in the near future, and that’s ok. I would rather not witness it than experience a second-rate version of it. As a creator, I would hate for anyone to experience something I created in a way it wasn’t meant to be. I would hate for someone to take my piece of live entertainment and watch it over and over until it’s dissected to the point of losing the magic. It would be like going to see the illusionist David Copperfield put on a stunning show only for him to reveal all the secrets afterward.

One thing I know for certain: every person I’ve spoken with about their Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser experience feels the same way about one thing. Whether or not they feel the experience is worth the cost, they all agree it’s unlike anything they’ve ever done, and no video can do it justice. For me, I’d be ok with knowing little about it even if I was never able to have the full experience for myself. How do you feel about it? Would you be willing to leave your cameras behind in order to fully immerse yourself? Leave a comment and let me know.

If you have any theme park topics you would like to hear my opinion on, let me know in the comments. You might just see it pop up in a future DePaoli on DeParks.


Jeff DePaoli is a producer and voiceover artist living in Los Angeles. He can be heard as the voice of Disney Trivia on Alexa as well as the host of “Dizney Coast to Coast,” the ultimate, unofficial Disney fan podcast. Get your FREE gifts of “America’s Hidden Mickeys,” “On the Rohde Again,” “Theme Park Comfort Kit” and more at DizneyCoastToCoast.com. DePaoli’s opinions are his own and do not necessarily represent Attractions Magazine.

Ad1

Related Articles

6 comments

Ernie March 28, 2022 - 9:10 am

For the price Disney is charging, I should be able to bring Steven Spielberg in with a film crew to record my vacation experiences!

Reply
Jeff DePaoli March 28, 2022 - 6:50 pm

LOL! That made me laugh.

Reply
Wendy Wangberg March 28, 2022 - 3:41 pm

I agree in some aspects. I really like the idea of Disney offering video/pictures of the experiences. They can focus in our our Magic Bands to determine which ones to send each of us. We are saving up to hopefully do this experience in 2025 for our daughter’s High School graduation gift and that would be an excellent benefit for paying so much money for this. If there were pictures and video offered, I would gladly put my phone away to enjoy the immersion fully.

Reply
Jeff DePaoli March 28, 2022 - 6:51 pm

Good luck. I hope you make it onto The Halcyon.

Reply
CB in SC March 29, 2022 - 7:39 am

I think there are pros and cons to both approaches. I’d probably take some video and photos, but I wouldn’t spend the whole day just filming.

With that said, if the experience is supposed to make you feel like it is a 100% real experience in the future or a distant galaxy, then removing all phones and video would actually lessen the “real” feel of it to me. Why? For better or worse, this is what people do on “real vacations” to exotic locations or once in a lifetime trips. You don’t enter London only to have an official say “no phones or video here it’s best to experience it in person”. Well, sure an in person trip to London is better than watching someone’s home video, but this – the home video – is, in my opinion, preferable to say a professionally filmed travel show in regards to showing the “real” London (that hasn’t been edited to show only the best parts). The same is true here. If this were a real trip into space, people would film and take photos. If Disney prohibits that, they might actually diminish the realism they said they were trying to achieve.

Reply
Jeff DePaoli March 29, 2022 - 9:03 pm

That’s an interesting point. Thanks for sharing.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Email Newsletter Signup

Get the latest news direct to your inbox.
Simply submit your email address below.